|
|
Home >
PlanWireless has been focusing on this important case since the March 1998 issue of PlanWireless (see also the April 1998 and May 1998 issues). Sprint Spectrum, in suing the Town of Ontario over the denial of three monopoles, claimed that technological imperatives dictated a series of shorter personal wireless service facilities to guarantee "in-building" coverage. To underline to the judge that they were right, Sprint Spectrum made the following points in their complaint:
In other words: "Sprint's right, everyone else is wrong." But Judge Telesca was having none of this technological-superiority claim. He felt that the Town of Ontario had the right to decide for itself what adequate service was, even though the Town lacked the technical knowledge to dispute Sprint's claims.
The important message is not that local governments get the last word, but rather that local governments should not stray into the area of technology in the first place. A local government should start to worry if they have staff or activists who think they are experts in radio frequency engineering. Click on "Facts About Personal Wireless Service Facilities" to see why. |
|
To learn more, subscribe to the PlanWireless newsletter...
Kreines & Kreines, Inc. |